A discussion of fame’s uses. This is an excerpt from a presentation by Professor Joseph Cohen at the City University of New York, Queens College at a joint presentation between Queens College’s Sociology Workshop and the Queens Podcast Lab’s Learning Series.
let’s talk about uses of fate i’m going
to be really quick because i realize i’m
running out of time and i want to have a
lot of time for discussion
how do people use fame
um
there are
four types of discussions about how fame
is deployed
that we’ve come across or that have come
up in our discussions
um
the first are psychic rewards
so
i i think a lot of
aspiring celebrities uh
think about uh these they’re young
people they think about esteem
impressing their friends getting the
love of strangers feeling wanted and
things like that
and
the micro celebrities who we interviewed
they they appreciate they do feel esteem
they are flattered that people follow
them they are very grateful but like i
said it that
i don’t know it it it it’s it feels very
much like they are that the investment
is lower than you might expect
uh they do enjoy fame if it’s part of
an activity that they enjoy or that’s a
creative outlet
uh and
for some people fame can be a mixed
blessing i had a discussion first of all
i’m going to talk about it earlier this
week i did a podcast with carrie ferris
who’s one of sociology’s leading
sociologists of fame and she said in her
work you know a lot of female news
anchors for example they get harassed
they don’t like it they have people come
up to them at dinner you know when
they’re at a restaurant to interrupt and
it’s unpleasant or it makes you feel
unsafe
and so
renown can be a mixed blessing and for
some people it’s just like it’s a fact
of life that they have to deal with
given the type of work they do they’re
in a communication-centric
line of work and this is like the price
you have to pay
it’s not unlike for example what a
professor might feel like if somebody
interrupts their dinner you know in the
cafeteria while they’re having friends
if they were to get a steady stream of
that you’re grateful you’re accessible
you know but
it can be too much there there are
instances where it can be too much and
even threatening
the second reason is money and
my sense is that fame is not easy to
monetize monetizes the word that they
use converting fame into money and it’s
really quite difficult
and even people who
are uh quite famous
they
generally they’ve reported
you know modest modest incomes a lot of
them have a lot of people who i thought
were quite famous had day jobs
um
or they had other sources of income
fame in and of itself even when you’re
well known
uh
you might not uh
lend itself to making much money unless
you’re extremely famous and often it’s a
subordinate uh motive anyways like
we i i think there are many creators
they know how they could become more
popular
uh there are ways that you could easily
create
an enterprise that is more popular by
doing something controversial or taking
up topics that are you know taboo or
whatever but like people don’t want to
uh because fame is often not the main
goal
what is valuable to a lot of our
respondents is status and group
membership
uh
there are some creators who are a lot
like academics you know how academics
they love sociology they want to build
sociology they want to meet other
sociologists they want to become
respected in the field of sociology
so that those type of dynamics occur in
a lot of areas of interest from comic
books
to like
vacation theme park you know time share
whatnot like there’s all sorts
and
we’ve run into creators who look a lot
like professors on you know esoteric
subjects that don’t fit neatly into
uh
into uh you know an academic discipline
but they’re still very serious about it
and a lot of those dynamics exist
the last thing that celebrity is uh
thought to be useful for is influence
and um
celebrity can
give you the power of exposure it gives
you the power to deliver a message to
someone but research into celebrity
endorsers shows that it’s more
complicated than that
audiences evaluate celebrities as if
they were like they do other people in
their lives they evaluate how much they
trust a celebrity how competent they
think a celebrity is to comment or make
an appraisal of an object that they’re
speaking about and they’ll listen to
them as they would any other person in
their life so for example if tom hanks
says you know go get your covet vaccine
there are people who
might reject you know not everybody will
listen to tom hanks even if they like
him they might say well tom hanks has
different politics from me or tom hanks
is not a medical professional so people
are thoughtful in how they evaluate
uh
how they evaluate the influence of
celebrities