People say that our obsession with frivolous celebrities is a sign of moral decay. Is it? This is an excerpt from a presentation by Professor Joseph Cohen at the City University of New York, Queens College at a joint presentation between Queens College’s Sociology Workshop and the Queens Podcast Lab’s Learning Series.
andy warhol once said in the future
everyone will be famous for 15 minutes
now the the quips attributed to walt
warhol even though there’s some dispute
as to whether or not he coined it it was
on a program of a show of his an
exhibition in 1968 out in sweden
it gained tremendous cultural resonance
in the 70s and 80s i mean we’ve all
heard the quote
it’s a good quote
and
the quote and a lot of warhol’s work
resonates with a view that celebrity is
something that’s becoming mass-produced
manufactured cheap often there’s
discussions about celebrity and you see
people say oh there are so many people
who are famous for being famous or
famous for nothing and a lot of people
see this new breed of celebrity and the
attention we pay to them and they take
it as a sign of dysfunction in society
it’s
you know a
decline in our character or something
that that is otherwise not great
now
warhol’s
observation
was made
an attraction that the quote gained
what happened in a very specific
historical context and it was a period
in which mass communications technology
was evolving
in ways that made new forms
of communication possible and new
cultural production enterprises more
viable
in the 70s and 80s there was a shift
towards a uh mass communications media
that allowed people to um uh consume
programming on a personal level like
without other people there were more
televisions the walkman came out car
radios and cassette players
uh uh portable audio like boom boxes
uh and so
one change that occurred in the 70s and
80s was
uh broadcast consumption or media
consumption a lot of it moved out of the
family room and into people’s personal
spaces and that allowed for new forms of
consumption
right uh it might be that the whole
family doesn’t want to watch an episode
of jackass on mtv or the whole family
doesn’t want to listen to a shock jock
you know or consume pornography but when
personalized consumption was more viable
those types of products gain traction
another change that happened was that
there were new media developing that
circumvented both legal and informal
regulations of culture so for example
cable tv and satellite tv allowed adult
programming to be broadcast on tv
whereas that wasn’t allowed on broadcast
tv uh over the airwaves uh video
cassettes uh and cassette tapes cassette
tapes enabled uh new forms of music to
be distributed music that wouldn’t be
sold or carried by a record label but
was easy enough for people to develop
grassroots markets for so the point that
i and
and what happened here was these new
media
created new cultural outlets and new
forms of culture
and when people looked at them they were
different from what they had seen before
and some people were left asking what is
this garbage what is this pornography on
television you know what’s this rap
music who’s this idiot on on on fm radio
why is this popular and at the time
there were a lot of debates about
censorship
fast forward 20 years and our era is
like that on steroids
whatever communication affordances were
created by things like cable tv or
cassette tapes is now uh
it’s it you know it’s exponentially
larger over the internet the internet
has created like an almost unlimited
pipeline of content and it’s almost
impossible
to uh regulate
and technology has evolved so that
people with next to no technical
knowledge or or specialty equipment or
money can set up
uh broadcast outlets that command
audiences that
are the size of what commercial
audiences drew
uh in past eras like for example at our
peak
on my podcast we were getting about 1200
listeners a week for a one-hour program
that’s that’s like a a drive home
audience in a for a radio station in a
mid-sized city like it’s one person on a
shoestring budget bringing in audiences
that used to be commanded by media
enterprises
and so what’s happened is
all sorts of new content has become
available and all of us have
uh our media audiences are fragmented
we’re now whereas once we might have all
watched the same set of shows or
listened to the same announcers watched
the same news now our media diets are
becoming more individuated
we have a distinct media diet even from
the people we live within our close
friends we follow different facebook
groups we follow different people on
twitter we like different youtube videos
we you know tune into different blogs
and that process where everybody’s
tuning into a different mix of uh
producers is called audience
fragmentation so what’s happened is
there’s a lot more content a lot more
media outlets and we’re dividing our
attention between it and so what happens
is there is now a much larger universe
of small-scale celebrities who are
delivering content that was once
unconventional
and so the the andy warhol observation
of of just fame looking cheap or
mass-produced or easy because we’re
seeing so much of it it’s now much more
like that
and it’s an interesting this development
is interesting in a lot of ways it gives
us a space for pr
probing concepts are fame and
celebrities seeing how they’ve changed
making note of this new environment and
thinking through the concepts